Right, but I'm afraid it may turn out a rather short-term solution in
the end. After all it's only (?) a question of linking against right
version of glibc.
P.
2009/8/27 Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 13:22, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
That's right, no one complained till now. Thanks God I never had to bother about glibc compatibility but it seems there are ways to build backward compatible programs on fresher Debian systems. I don't know if it helps but maybe
I don't know how to intepret their text (I don't have too much time at the moment either), but quoting them:
As an example, a binary compiled on a Debian Lenny system with glibc 2.7 won't run on a Debian Sarge system with glibc 2.3 because the older glibc version doesn't have all the features found and used when the binary was compiled on a newer system. A binary compiled on Debian Sarge will run on Debian Lenny, however, thanks to backwards compatibility.
In practice, all this means is that you need to compile your application in a sufficiently old distribution. Examples of distributions that have been used successfully for making portable binaries include old glibc 2.2.5 based Red Hat Linux versions, Debian Sarge, and Debian Etch.
Mojca