![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6114858d84b0f40cf715f12237ab67a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:29 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Exactly the same happens on Sparc Solaris.
see before.
I don't know if it's the case, but LuaJIT has vm written in assembly. I don't expect that it will work on every platform as Luatex.
Nevermind. I've found the table here: http://luajit.org/install.html and I'll try to exclude compilation of luajittex on the platforms that have no chance of getting luajittex compiled at all. Here's the list, please let me know if I got any of the platforms wrong: x86_64-linux - YES (gcc 4.x) i386-linux - YES (gcc 3.4+) powerpc-linux - YES (gcc 4.3+) armel-linux - YES (gcc 4.2+, not sure if armelhf also works?, but we don't currently include it) x86_64-darwin - YES i386-darwin - YES? (compilation works for me on 10.7, but Dick has problems on 10.6) powerpc-darwin - NO? (based on website claims) universal-darwin - [if the above is true, we can only ship the i386 part of the binary if needed by anyone] amd64-freebsd - YES? (website claims the contrary, but Alan compiled it) amd64-kfreebsd - same as above i386-freebsd - YES i386-kfreebsd - YES i386-solaris - YES? (website doesn't mention Solaris at all, but LuaJIT alone builds on i386 Solaris where I tested just fine; Marco didn't commit anything yet) sparc-solaris - NO (I also get 'lj_arch.h:55:2: error: #error "No support for this architecture (yet)"') So: I'll exclude some platforms when building, but I would also like to ask Luigi to test if luajittex has any chance to be built at all, so that compilation won't run forever just to hit the #error "No support for this architecture (yet)" towards the end of building process. Mojca
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ac3fbaf0a287c4cffbc9f18fa931586c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:49:01 +0100
Mojca Miklavec
amd64-freebsd - YES? (website claims the contrary, but Alan compiled it) amd64-kfreebsd - same as above i386-freebsd - YES i386-kfreebsd - YES
But I did NOT try running it... yet! Alan -- Alan Braslau CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC CNRS URA 2464 Orme des Merisiers 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15 fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86 mailto:alan.braslau@cea.fr
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b34c604e9bcd368d6253dd0860af9fff.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
MM> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:49:01 +0100
MM> From: Mojca Miklavec
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/02a711d78d02355347d6cff73fda2572.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 2013–01–09 Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hi Mojca,
i386-solaris - YES? (website doesn't mention Solaris at all, but LuaJIT alone builds on i386 Solaris where I tested just fine; Marco didn't commit anything yet)
sorry for the delay. It built without problems. However, I cannot commit the changes: Adding (bin) luajittex/luajittex Transmitting file data .svn: E175002: Commit failed (details follow): svn: E175002: Server sent unexpected return value (500 Internal Server Error) in response to PUT request for '/suite-bin/!svn/txr/60-1v/tex/i386-solaris/luajittex/luajittex' The error message indicates that it's something wrong with the server. But since everyone else was able to commit, maybe it's on my side. Did anything change? We used Solaris 10 before, now it's updated to Solaris 11. Did I mess up some configuration? Any ideas? Marco
participants (4)
-
Alan BRASLAU
-
Boris Veytsman
-
Marco
-
Mojca Miklavec