On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 7:39 PM, luigi scarso wrote:

: Il 17/gen/2016 19:37, "Thomas A. Schmitz" ha scritto:

...

On 01/17/2016 07:25 PM, luigi scarso wrote:

...

Hi all, there is a new beta-0.88.0 on the svn server. It should be all ok, but never say never. Please compile, test and report any problem.

We will wait a little before the formal announcement.

Luigi,

is it really on the server? I get

luatex (skipping): ver. {beta-0.87.0 r5668} is the latest version

after a svn co, so no 0.88.0.

Thomas

Hm. Let me check.

The svn repo on foundry looks ok: I have just checked that svn checkout --username anonsvn https://foundry.supelec.fr/svn/luatex/tags/beta-0.88.0 gives and compiles correctly the latest luatex 0.88.0 . As I only use the foundry repo, and it looks ok to me, maybe I'm missing something. -- luigi

Luigi, builds from svn successful as I reported on linux and freebsd, 64 and 32 bit. Mojca, I then tried the repository on the garden, just to check, but the server appears to be down: svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'http://svn.contextgarden.net/suite/build-binaries' Once Luigi releases, please let us know when we should try building and committing. Alan On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:46:06 -0700 Alan BRASLAU wrote:

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 19:37:34 +0100 "Thomas A. Schmitz" wrote:

...

On 01/17/2016 07:25 PM, luigi scarso wrote:

...

Hi all, there is a new beta-0.88.0 on the svn server. It should be all ok, but never say never. Please compile, test and report any problem.

We will wait a little before the formal announcement.

Luigi,

is it really on the server? I get

luatex (skipping): ver. {beta-0.87.0 r5668} is the latest version

after a svn co, so no 0.88.0.

I get:

build/texk/web2c/luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.88.0 (TeX Live 2016/dev)

(build successful on freebsd and on linux)

-- Alan Braslau CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC CNRS UMR 3680 Orme des Merisiers 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15 fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86 mailto:alan.braslau@cea.fr

On 01/17/2016 09:51 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

There's a cron job on the server that didn't run yet when Luigi posted the announcement, but it's there now. I increased the frequency of syncing again (the syncs were running twice per day; I decreased the frequency at one point when there were no releases for almost a year).

Ah sorry, I was talking about the svn on the garden. Now everything works fine, 0.88.0 built and commited for powerpc-linux (does anybody use this stuff at all?). Thomas

On 17 January 2016 at 22:56, Alan BRASLAU wrote:

I have now compiled and committed: freebsd 64 and 32 bit linux 64 and 32 bit

For linux, which can be a bit particular about libc versions, I have compiled on Debian "oldstable". We have discovered that this is not old enough for these binaries to run on CentOS 5, for example (where I used to compile the 64bit binaries). In the past, no-one running linux 32bit has complained, so let's see if Debian/oldstable vintage libc causes problems for anyone now... (in which case we will do something about it).

Perfect, thank you. So we now have all the binaries other than Solaris (due to problems with a broken libpng) and the two flavours of arm. Hans, if you were waiting for the new LuaTeX with some special release of ConTeXt, you should be good to go. Mojca

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:37:52 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote:

On 1/17/2016 11:58 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...

On 17 January 2016 at 22:56, Alan BRASLAU wrote:

...

I have now compiled and committed: freebsd 64 and 32 bit linux 64 and 32 bit

For linux, which can be a bit particular about libc versions, I have compiled on Debian "oldstable". We have discovered that this is not old enough for these binaries to run on CentOS 5, for example (where I used to compile the 64bit binaries). In the past, no-one running linux 32bit has complained, so let's see if Debian/oldstable vintage libc causes problems for anyone now... (in which case we will do something about it).

Perfect, thank you.

So we now have all the binaries other than Solaris (due to problems with a broken libpng) and the two flavours of arm.

Hans, if you were waiting for the new LuaTeX with some special release of ConTeXt, you should be good to go.

Is the pi fast enough? Maybe i should put a large usb stick in the thingie (at least for backup) (not that dead-slow gust one).

Mojca, Hans, The uploaded linux64 binary was compiled under Debian/oldstable rather than CentOS 5. This can serve as a test of any eventual incompatibility for users of the standalone. I tired updating my local ConTeXt download on the CentOS machine and see that the new binaries have not yet been propagated, being on hold for the moment. Once they will be made available, should we be sending a message to the mailing list asking for feedback, in particular pointing out that one MAY experience a shared library incompatibility on a really old linux 64bit installation, and if so, we would like to be informed -- Alan Braslau CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC CNRS UMR 3680 Orme des Merisiers 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15 fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86 mailto:alan.braslau@cea.fr Alan