On 27-4-2012 05:26, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Hi Taco,
With this commit arbitrary number of top and/or bottom accents can be nested and still be positioned properly, so I think there is no need for `\Umathaccent both` anymore, so do you object if we deprecated it now, and later when it is completely removed math accent code can be simplified again (no need for separate field for bottom accents with all its complexity), what do you think?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:28:29PM +0200, Cron Daemon wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r4371 | khaled | 2012-04-26 18:18:10 +0200 (Thu, 26 Apr 2012) | 5 lines Changed paths: M /trunk/source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/mlist.w
Properly position stacked math accents
If the accentee is a |sub_math_list|, we check if it is composed of an |accent_noad| we use the positioning of its nucleus, up to the inner most |accent_noad|.
it was introduced with a reason (also proabably inspired by mathml): with 'both' we only need to pick up the argument (math expression) once can you be a bit more explicit about removing the bottom option? how does one position at the bottom then (as Umathbotaccent was removed)? Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------