Johan Sandblom wrote:
In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines occur
... \definemathcharacter [c] [nothing] [mr] ["63] \definemathcharacter [d] [nothing] [mr] ["65] \definemathcharacter [e] [nothing] [mr] ["65] \definemathcharacter [f] [nothing] [mr] ["66] ...
and
... \definemathcharacter [C] [nothing] [mr] ["43] \definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["45] \definemathcharacter [E] [nothing] [mr] ["45] \definemathcharacter [F] [nothing] [mr] ["46] ...
making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a mistake?
indeed, should be "64 and "44 hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------