On 2/22/2015 6:37 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\startbuffer[demo] <doc> <p><code><div>foo</div></code></p> <pre><code>for a > b & c</code></pre> </doc> \stopbuffer
\starttext
\startxmlsetups xml:initialize \xmlsetsetup{#1}{p|doc|code}{xml:*} \xmlsetsetup{#1}{pre/code}{xml:pre} \stopxmlsetups
\xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize}
\startxmlsetups xml:doc \xmlflush{#1} \stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:p \xmlflush{#1}\par \stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:code \begingroup\tt\xmlflush{#1}\endgroup\par
\xmlinlineverbatim{#1} \stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:pre \xmlverbatim{#1} \stopxmlsetups
\xmlprocessbuffer{main}{demo}{}
\stoptext
And I experience two issues:
Is there a way to handle <code> (or <pre>) as verbatim, but translating the five entities that need to be escaped in XML?
Which is the right way to link a <pre> or <code> to a type or typing command? \startxmlsetups xml:code \begingroup \tt \xmlflushspacewise{#1} \endgroup \stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:pre \begingroup \tt \xmlflushspacewise{#1} \endgroup \stopxmlsetups -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------