You can do it on the template... you can use a yaml variable to determine if the toc should be printed or not. Like so:
yaml file:
---
toc: true
...
template file:
%%%%%%%
$if(toc)$
\completecontent
$endif$
%%%%%%%
Send ntg-context mailing list submissions to
ntg-context@ntg.nl
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ntg-context-request@ntg.nl
You can reach the person managing the list at
ntg-context-owner@ntg.nl
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ntg-context digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Typesetting Markdown – Part 5: Interpolation
(Aditya Mahajan)
2. Re: Typesetting Markdown – Part 5: Interpolation (Thangalin)
3. Re: Typesetting Markdown – Part 5: Interpolation
(Aditya Mahajan)
4. request for \definefontfamily and \definefallbackfamily
(Pablo Rodriguez)
5. Re: crappy names in the fontloader (Hans Hagen)
6. problems with images, layers and crop marks (Henning Hraban Ramm)
7. Re: problems with images, layers and crop marks (Hans Hagen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 10:17:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Typesetting Markdown – Part 5:
Interpolation
Message-ID: <nycvar.YAK.7.76.1907071012590.13567@nqv-guvaxcnq>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019, Thangalin wrote:
> Hello again!
>
> This part of the series describes how to reference *interpolated* strings
> inside Markdown documents.
> https://dave.autonoma.ca/blog/2019/07/06/typesetting-markdown-part-5/
>
> There's a section at the end about eliminating the table of contents from a
> reusable document template. I would have preferred using setups, rather
> than redefining the \completecontent macro, but didn't see an obvious way
> to do so.
Why not simply omit \compltecontent from the pandoc template?
Aditya
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 11:58:12 -0700
From: Thangalin <thangalin@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Typesetting Markdown – Part 5:
Interpolation
Message-ID:
<CAANrE7qd81BudwSHBWufu=MpDDUPn5fh8ZBM63qLVZ160gZH=g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thank you Aditya.
The main.tex file is meant to be reusable for different document styles. By
removing \completecontent altogether from the main template, it would
preclude a different document from reusing the main.tex template with a
table of contents. I'd like the template to be "reusable"; making
modifications to "main.tex" --- or creating a copy --- would subvert that
goal.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 7:17 AM Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2019, Thangalin wrote:
>
> > Hello again!
> >
> > This part of the series describes how to reference *interpolated* strings
> > inside Markdown documents.
> > https://dave.autonoma.ca/blog/2019/07/06/typesetting-markdown-part-5/
> >
> > There's a section at the end about eliminating the table of contents
> from a
> > reusable document template. I would have preferred using setups, rather
> > than redefining the \completecontent macro, but didn't see an obvious way
> > to do so.
>
> Why not simply omit \compltecontent from the pandoc template?
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/attachments/20190707/25ca6215/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 15:17:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Typesetting Markdown – Part 5:
Interpolation
Message-ID: <nycvar.YAK.7.76.1907071512000.13567@nqv-guvaxcnq>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sun, 7 Jul 2019, Thangalin wrote:
> Thank you Aditya.
>
> The main.tex file is meant to be reusable for different document styles. By
> removing \completecontent altogether from the main template, it would
> preclude a different document from reusing the main.tex template with a
> table of contents. I'd like the template to be "reusable"; making
> modifications to "main.tex" --- or creating a copy --- would subvert that
> goal.
Pandoc allows that. For example, see line 140 of the default context
template:
https://github.com/jgm/pandoc-templates/blob/master/default.context
I don't remember the exact command line parameters for pandoc that set
the toc flag to true.
An equivalent method will be to control this using a ConTeXt mode.
Redefining \completecontent to \empty seems too drastic.
Aditya
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 21:29:49 +0200
From: Pablo Rodriguez <oinos@gmx.es>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: [NTG-context] request for \definefontfamily and
\definefallbackfamily
Message-ID: <857b6e26-0b65-c2a4-6569-e664f0111d1e@gmx.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Wolfgang,
I have two requests to be implemented in \definefontfamily.
The first one is that is able to load fonts not defined as entries in
the font database.
Here you have a minimal sample:
\definefont[Test][file:texgyrepagella-regular.otf at 10pt]
\definefont[TestOne][file:texgyrepagella-regular-500.otf at 10pt]
\definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [Pagella]
[tf={file:texgyrepagella-regular.otf},
bf={file:texgyrepagella-regular-500.otf}]
\setupbodyfont[mainface]
\starttext
normal\\
\bf bold not working\\
\Test this works
\TestOne this works
\stoptext
The second one would be to allow method=uppercase to
\definefallbackfamily, so it could be used to fake small caps (such as
in https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/092878.html.
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 23:42:11 +0200
From: Hans Hagen <j.hagen@xs4all.nl>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] crappy names in the fontloader
Message-ID: <ea884d13-5c0e-9772-8f69-c2f13ddb224e@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 7/6/2019 6:36 PM, Marcel Fabian Krüger wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> under default settings, the fontloaders discards all glyph names which
> are considered "crappy", meaning matching the "p_crappyname" pattern in
> "font-oup.lua". For some names this makes a lot of sense. For example
> the name "uni0303" is considered "crappy" and it really provides no
> useful information. Then there are other names like "t_uni0303" which
> are still considered "crappy" while they actually aren't completely
> useless. So I think there would be some value in preserving them. Of
> course, you can always enable "otf.keepnames" if you need names like
> this.
>
> But I actually want to talk about another class of names: Look at
> "Udotbelow". This is IMHO a perfectly normal and useful name, but the
> fontloader still considers it "crappy" because it starts with a "U"
> followed by a letter which could be a hexadecimal number.
>
> I think this is a bit over-agressive. Maybe the "p_crappyname" pattern
> could be changed to only look for "u<hexadecimal>" if followed by
> "p_done", marking the end of a component?
i'll look into it (irr in generic mode (latex etc) one can disable that
'feature' which i thought happened)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 23:06:56 +0000
From: Henning Hraban Ramm <texml@fiee.net>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: [NTG-context] problems with images, layers and crop marks
Message-ID:
<20190707230656.Horde.IVjTQk9tNtFVGH0IBsHNXDk@webmail.fiee.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
Hi all,
I’m quite quiet at the moment, because I can access my mailing list
address only via inconvenient webmail; since I updated MacOS, neither
Apple Mail nor Thunderbird will take my password anymore... :-((
Besides, I’m currently well paid for working with LaTeX, and my other
projects get less time.
Anyway, one of our authors finally submitted her final corrections,
and "of course" my ConTeXt setup that still worked well in May doesn’t
behave any more:
* stacked layers won’t work on the first page (there should be a title
bar above an image; it works on the back cover, but not on the front;
but I can enable one of both layers)
That might be related to:
* on some right pages, including p.1 (cover), crop marks are shifted
one page width to the right.
* on some pages, crop marks are shifted vertically; might be related
to using \offset for image placement.
I’m trying to cook up MWEs, but the behaviour is so strange and
irregular, that I don’t know if I can reproduce it in a simpler
environment... I suspect my combined use of postponing, makeups,
layers and \offset might have grown side effects since May.
Any ideas?
Greetlings, Hraban
Greetlings, Hraban
Grüßlinge, Hraban
---
https://www.fiee.net
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de
GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:52:51 +0200
From: Hans Hagen <j.hagen@xs4all.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>, Henning
Hraban Ramm <texml@fiee.net>
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] problems with images, layers and crop marks
Message-ID: <26b17c1c-04b7-7398-4c5f-f514c942671e@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 7/8/2019 1:06 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hi all,
> I’m quite quiet at the moment, because I can access my mailing list
> address only via inconvenient webmail; since I updated MacOS, neither
> Apple Mail nor Thunderbird will take my password anymore... :-((
> Besides, I’m currently well paid for working with LaTeX, and my other
> projects get less time.
>
>
> Anyway, one of our authors finally submitted her final corrections, and
> "of course" my ConTeXt setup that still worked well in May doesn’t
> behave any more:
>
> * stacked layers won’t work on the first page (there should be a title
> bar above an image; it works on the back cover, but not on the front;
> but I can enable one of both layers)
>
> That might be related to:
>
> * on some right pages, including p.1 (cover), crop marks are shifted one
> page width to the right.
>
> * on some pages, crop marks are shifted vertically; might be related to
> using \offset for image placement.
>
> I’m trying to cook up MWEs, but the behaviour is so strange and
> irregular, that I don’t know if I can reproduce it in a simpler
> environment... I suspect my combined use of postponing, makeups, layers
> and \offset might have grown side effects since May.
>
> Any ideas?
afaik nothing fundamental changed in these areas (ok, maybe you operate
out of the formal functionality) ... of course, if you're using lmtx it
might be that something got fixed in there, as at that moment it was
more experimental than it is now
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------
End of ntg-context Digest, Vol 181, Issue 8
*******************************************