Re: [NTG-context] epstopdf oddity?

Dear Luigi, At Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:06:56 +0100, luigi scarso wrote:

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Marko Schütz wrote:

...

Dear All,

I have some small diagrams I created with MetaPost in 2005. Just recently I wanted to re-run the build of the PDF. It produced a PDF but the typography looks awful. so I compared (diff) with the previous intermediate files and found that the EPS files produced by the mpost run are identical up to timestamps and that it's only the last step epstopdf that uglifies the output. I'm suspecting the fault to be with the ghostscript or the font installation. Maybe someone here has seen this and knows the fix? Can you also try with epstpdf of latest TeXLive ? or see here http://www.mail-archive.com/ctan-ann@dante.de/msg02109.html

thank you very much for the hint. Unfortunately, that did not solve the problem. It turns out I guessed right: the problem was with ghostscript and font installation. Ghostscript was not knowing about the type1 fonts in the tex installation. I found Fontmap.cmr on CTAN and its instructions helped me solve the problem. Marko

-- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________