RE: [NTG-context] some XML stuff (and bugs?)

At 17:27 11/08/2003 +0200, you wrote:

Currently, I have this solved -- I process my buffers first using XSLT (as I cannot decompose <... etc. in verbatim buffers into <... and then process the buffer using processXMLbuffer) to generate \startbuffer..\stopbuffer containing <>, and I assure that all buffers will contain <math> and </math> to avoid problems with expanding for \XMLremapdata.

i must have a script somewhere that prepares verbatim (simply because i want to have more structure and so); maybe it makes sense to cook up a sort of standard for buffers so that we can preprocess in an uniform way (some regexp substitution is normally much faster that xslt or full blown parsing). something: .... although formally this equals an empty buffer, so maybe: makes more sense does this sound ok? Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------