I believe Guy Worthington said this around Wed, 29 Jan 2003:
Adam Lindsay wrote:
I was wondering if anyone else was interested in the Euler math font. I was a bit frustrated in its incomplete coverage of certain symbols (e.g. delimiters, radicals), but then I discovered the Virtual Euler Math fonts/eulervm for LaTeX.
Sounds great.
Does anyone do enough math typesetting to want to test "zeuler" out? I've gotten good enough results this evening, but I don't have a lot of sophisticated formulae lying around to do a full test. Does anyone have some semi- demanding (non-AMS-territory) math for me to try?
Here's a script used to test the mathtimes fonts: (courtesy of YandY). I simply commented out the bits that were giving ConTeXt indigestion. It works for me using cm* fonts.
Many thanks, Guy. The accents (e.g., \qtr) are definitely going to take some work, and the BoldMath switching is also going to take a bit of learning, but the file runs very well. Just the sort of thing I was looking for. Cheers, adam -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Adam Lindsay +44(0)1524 594 537 atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/atl/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=