On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:36:15AM +0200, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2007 23:31:00 +0200, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2007-05-09 um 13:47 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
\enableregime[utf]
\usemodule[lilypond]
\starttext
\startlilypond % Telemann, TWV 40:11 \version "2.6.3"
far tool old! use the latest LilyPond 2.10.x! (the module works only with LilyPond > 2.8, as mentioned on the wiki page)
\relative c? {
You've always ? instead of ' -- that can't work! We need code, not typography!
Pardon?!
The example you refer to is from the recent version of "t-lilypond.pdf" from ctan as I wrote in my initial posting (see below).
As I had to start somewhere, I thought it's a good start to use the most recent versions of lilypond-2.10.23-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2 from lilypond.org, t-lilypond.pdf from ctan and t-lilypond.tex that you have posted here last week.
I have no idea why this leads to statements like "far tool old" and "We need code, not typography!".
But it seems something is wrong here.
Steffen
I also had my first brush with the lilypond module recently and also started with the example included in the manual. I don't know if I'm right (having no idea about module's inner workings) but it seems that the offending command is \version "2.6.3" after removing it everything went surprisingly smooth. Piotr