On 9/21/2018 12:05 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:06 AM Taco Hoekwater <taco@elvenkind.com
> <mailto:taco@elvenkind.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On 21 Sep 2018, at 10:59, luigi scarso <luigi.scarso@gmail.com
> <mailto:luigi.scarso@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > % start demo
> > \enabledirectives[system.callbacks.permitoverloads]
> > % previous line allows redefinition of ‘wrapup_run’
> > iirc ,
> > this should be avoided ….
>
> Sure, but I find wrapup_run extremely useful, and I know of no other
> way to use it.
>
>
> sure but the idea of modifying the context state (broadly speaking)
> before that context says that the state is consistent
> (ie the run is finished, in this case) is , how to say.. hm hm.
> Maybe signalling with an asyn msg that has nothing todo with the context
> state (just to say "Hey, context here: I am finishing the run" to
> somebofy else) ,
> but usually one wants also to check the starts and the end of the run
> as process, ie just before the run starts and just after the run ended.
> This case seems safe but I have already dubious on \
> $ lua -e ' os.execute("ls \c*") '
> lua: (command line):1: invalid escape sequence near '\c'
> while
> $ lua -e ' os.execute([[ls \c*]])'
> is ok
> Also, I run context foo.tex and at the end of the runs I found foo.pdf
> (expected) and doc-<idcode>.pdf ("hm .. where does it come from ? I dont
> remember ...I have to look into the source" )
> so two times the space --- and the copy is done at each run, iirc.
>
>
> But it's just to complete the picture: once one knows the limits, it's
> a useful callback.
that callback is really the last ... files have been closed then
sure , but after it there are 2 free_<something> and free the Lua state,
--- and closing a file can be delayed by the OS. Anyway, this case looks ok.
--