On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 04:29:18PM +0200, Gour wrote:
Gour (gour@mail.inet.hr) wrote:
Pls. excuse me for repyling on my own post :-(
My own stupidity.
I saw in log file that \utfunifontglyph macro is not expanding properly, ie. doesn't find correct glyphname (amacron & Amacron) and I added definitions for them in unic-001.tex, but I didn't notice that Hans made two versions, and the 2nd version was still without required char definiton.
As you noticed, unicode support is far from complete; many unicode vectors are still empty or have gaps. It is a lot of work to fill them. IMHO this can best be done using Sebastian Rahtz's work, unicode.sty and ucharacters.sty. Meanwhile it is useful to report any additions you may work out, for inclusion in the distribution. Regards, Simon -- Simon Pepping email: spepping@scaprea.hobby.nl