Hi Hans,
maybe you understand the question mark now, you are part of it.
Unfortunately, I haven't received a reply to my last e-mail from
January 18.
Maybe only those whose questions are more serious, more
interesting or whatever will get an answer.
I do not understand what you mean with "as follow up on the
keyword thread we decided to treat bad values to equivalent to
'no'"! Which values are bad in this context?
With the new ConTeXt version, "grid" no longer works for me! Too
bad.
Should my attempt to use ConTeXt end here?
Greetings
Am 18.01.24 um 13:06 schrieb Hans Hagen
via ntg-context:
On
1/18/2024 12:59 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
What is going on?
Yesterday I got a perfect on-grid-written document!
But today, with the newest context-version (20240118) all
changed for the worse.
as follow up on the keyword thread we decided to treat bad values
to equivalent to 'no'
I may not get a reply to this e-mail
either!
?
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net
(mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________