Re: [NTG-context] Grammar (was: Semantic data in ConTeXt?)

Whether it is useless/'no problem exists' is not up to you to decide: it is up to those who do find it important. As long as some people find it important, no childish dismissals will remove that importance. It seems the most successful/widely adopted form is to vary from 'he' to 'she' (so that in one sentence you use one, in the next another). Some authors even change the gender within a sentence. This method was adopted because 'one' (the "real" correct unisex pronoun) is just too awkward for extended use. The morphographic he/she/he/she method reads surprisingly well. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Matija Šuklje wrote:

Dne ponedeljek 26. julija 2010 ob 01:47:13 je David Rogers napisal(a):

...

* Matija Šuklje [2010-07-25 23:33]:

...

-.-.- P.S. Is there a nicer wording then "(s)he" for referencing persona in unisex gender (other then "one")?

The correct unisex pronoun is "he". This whole question is an invented problem where no real problem exists.

Thanks for explaining. This unisex and other politically correct stuff is always a bit odd.

Cheers, Matija -- gsm: +386 41 849 552 www: http://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suklje@gabbler.org ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki     : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________