Re: [NTG-context] [Index] Indenting long primaries after secondaries
On 3/7/2014 6:54 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2014-02-26 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary index entry, the second line is not indented as usual, see the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no] \starttext \index{primary+secondary+tertiary} \index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }} \index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % but this is Ok \input{tufte} \completeindex \stoptext
I've tested this in new beta and the issue is still there...
how is a \dorecurse supposed to get sorted ... ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-03-16 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 3/7/2014 6:54 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2014-02-26 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
when a long primary is preceded with the secondary or tertiary index entry, the second line is not indented as usual, see the following example:
\setupregister[balance=no] \starttext \index{primary+secondary+tertiary} \index[primary long]{\dorecurse{5}{primary long }} \index[primary longer]{\dorecurse{5}{primary longer }} % Ok \input{tufte} \completeindex \stoptext
how is a \dorecurse supposed to get sorted ...
That \dorecurse is used in this MWE only to make it shorter. Indeed, this command confuses the letter grouping procedure so this is the reason why I specified the sorting key via the bracket syntax []. I think there is no need to fix this grouping issue (not enough ROI), but if so, I would expect to resolve the \dorecurse command first and then apply the grouping/sorting etc. My main wish is fixing that indentation (or offering any workaround). Thanks, Jan
participants (2)
-
Hans Hagen -
Jan Tosovsky