Is alternative=serried broken in enumerations?
Hi! I'm using the current beta, and I get the following error when trying to use alternative=serried. (The minimal example is included in the error message.) <error> system > tex > error on line 6 in file test.tex: Undefined control sequence ... 1 \defineenumeration[myenumeration][alternative=serried] 2 3 \starttext 4 5 \startmyenumeration 6 >> This is a test. 7 \stopmyenumeration 8 9 \stoptext 10 \12>:144>:serried ...onstructionlocationparameter \c!width }\doifsetupselse ... \139>construction ...parameter \c!renderingsetup } \relax \dostoptagged \dost... \dodogotopar ...andler \v!construction \endcsname \BeforePar \emptytoks <to be read again> T l.6 T his is a test. </error> Any ideas? - Janne Junnila
Am 22.02.2012 um 16:51 schrieb Janne Junnila:
Hi!
I'm using the current beta, and I get the following error when trying to use alternative=serried. (The minimal example is included in the error message.)
<error> system > tex > error on line 6 in file test.tex: Undefined control sequence ...
1 \defineenumeration[myenumeration][alternative=serried] 2 3 \starttext 4 5 \startmyenumeration 6 >> This is a test. 7 \stopmyenumeration 8 9 \stoptext 10
\12>:144>:serried ...onstructionlocationparameter \c!width }\doifsetupselse ... \139>construction ...parameter \c!renderingsetup } \relax \dostoptagged \dost... \dodogotopar ...andler \v!construction \endcsname \BeforePar \emptytoks <to be read again> T l.6 T his is a test. </error>
Any ideas?
strc-con.mkvi \startsetups[\??constructionrenderings:\v!serried] - \edef\p_width{\constructionlocationparameter\c!width}% CHECK ! ! ! wrong parameter namespace + \edef\p_width{\constructionparameter\c!width}% CHECK ! ! ! wrong parameter namespace \doifsetupselse{\??constructionrenderings:\v!serried:\p_width} { \directsetup{\??constructionrenderings:\v!serried:\p_width} } { \directsetup{\??constructionrenderings:\v!serried:\v!wide} } \stopsetups Wolfgang
participants (2)
-
Janne Junnila
-
Wolfgang Schuster