Taco Hoekwater schrieb am 29.05.2019 um 16:20:

Hi again,

Another question on nearly the same subject: how can I get nested itemizations to listen to the before= and after= keys? AFAICT, they always use the inbetween= instead of above= and below= keys? ConTeXt supports before/after values for the inner itemizations but they are hidden by a conditional and there is no official way to change it (e.g. \setupitemize[spacing=local|global] or \setupitemize[method=1|2|3]). Wolfgang

On 5/29/2019 5:20 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

Hi Wolfgang,

So the answer is no right now, then? In that case, I would like to log a formal feature request ;) so a nested margin would be enough?

----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, Not here. The extra empty brackets seem to ‘destroy’ the option=intext setting, and I am left with a para going like this: • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec dapibus turpis et nulla venenatis tincidunt. Curabitur sit amet vehicula nisi, sit amet instead of • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec dapibus turpis et nulla venenatis tincidunt. Curabitur sit amet vehicula nisi, sit amet (extra empty brackets rarely are without side-effects) Best wishes, Taco

On 29 May 2019, at 16:27, Tomas Hala wrote:

Hi Taco,

probably, there is missing one pair of []:

\setupitemize[1][][margin=1cm] \setupitemize[2][][margin=2cm]

I tried it with TL2018 and I guess it works.

Best wishes,

Tomáš

Wed, May 29, 2019 ve 04:15:25PM +0200 Taco Hoekwater napsal(a): # Hi all, # # I must be getting old :( # # It used to be that I could get ConTeXt to do what I wanted, but that is increasingly getting harder. # # Current problem: I would like to have itemizations that behave like in this dummy # ascii formatting: # # * Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec dapibus turpis et # nulla venenatis tincidunt. Curabitur sit amet vehicula nisi, sit amet # # and so far it has been impossible for me to set up \setupitemize to do what I want. # # In descriptive text, what I want is: # # 1. some global indentation to the left and/or right. That is what the margin= key does # 2. the symbol (or number) typeset in a specific width. That is the width= key # 3. some distance between the number box and the following text. That is the distance= key # 4. on line 2 and forward to the end of the item, I want a *different* indentation from the first item line. # # In this particular case, I want no extra indentation except for ‘margin’, but in other # cases I may like either more or less indentation than on line 1 of the first para of the item. # # The desired effect is simple achieve with primitive operations, but I would like the input # to look nice (not to mention that I do not want to loose options for cross-referencing etc). # # \setupitemize[option=intext] # # is nearly right for this case (with indentation equal to the left margin), so I assumed I would # be able to tweak that. But the problem there is that while it does 2-4, it ignores the extra # indentation required for nested itemizations (it even ignores explicit margin= settings for the # nested level). After fighting with this for hours, I am nearly ready to give up. # # Anybody have any idea how to get itemizations to do what I want? # # MWE attached. # # Best wishes, # Taco # PS It seems that “indentnext=no” does not work for nested itemizations?

# # # # #

# ___________________________________________________________________________________ # If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! # # maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context # webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net # archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ # wiki : http://contextgarden.net # ___________________________________________________________________________________

Tomáš Hála -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mendelova univerzita, Provozně ekonomická fakulta, ústav informatiky Zemědělská 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, tel. +420 545 13 22 28 -------------------------------------------------------------------- http://akela.mendelu.cz/~thala ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

Taco Hoekwater Elvenkind BV

Hi,

On 29 May 2019, at 16:53, Tomas Hala wrote:

You're right... And this?

\setupitemize[1][option=intext][margin=1cm] \setupitemize[2][option=intext][margin=2cm]

Sorry, no go, intext is back, but the nested margin setting is ignored. I also tested with \setupitemize[1][intext][margin=1cm] \setupitemize[2][intext][margin=2cm] and \setupitemize[1][option=intext,margin=1cm] \setupitemize[2][option=intext,margin=2cm] ConText always uses the outermost margin setting only. Best wishes, Taco

Hans, You missed this bit: # > # \setupitemize[option=intext] # > # # > # is nearly right for this case (with indentation equal to the left margin), so I assumed I would # > # be able to tweak that. But the problem there is that while it does 2-4, it ignores the extra # > # indentation required for nested itemizations (it even ignores explicit margin= settings for the # > # nested level). After fighting with this for hours, I am nearly ready to give up. # > #

On 29 May 2019, at 16:59, Hans Hagen wrote:

On 5/29/2019 4:15 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

...

Hi all, I must be getting old :( It used to be that I could get ConTeXt to do what I wanted, but that is increasingly getting harder. Current problem: I would like to have itemizations that behave like in this dummy ascii formatting: * Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec dapibus turpis et nulla venenatis tincidunt. Curabitur sit amet vehicula nisi, sit amet \setupitemgroup[itemize][intext,star]

\setupitemgroup[itemize][intext,star]

\startitemize% [intext,star] \startitem \dorecurse{3}{Taco is getting old, very old, very very old! } \stopitem \startitem \dorecurse{3}{Itemize is one of the oldest mechanism! } \stopitem \startitem \dorecurse{3}{Young Wolfgang will answer all his questions! } \stopitem \stopitemize

----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Taco Hoekwater Elvenkind BV