Hi all, I used to compile a beamer file with LuaLaTeX to generate a PDF for presentation then convert the beamer file to XHTML with LaTeXML for Web page. Recently I begin to use ConTeXt so I try to get a PDF for presentation and also XML/HTML output from a single ConTeXt file. I have a few questions about XML/HTML output of Math. 1. In case inline math mode with \displaystyle, we get wrong output of "\int_a^b"; lower limit and upper limit are interchanged and further "b" is a bit larger and an integral symbol is rather small. (It looks "\displaystyle" is not effective, e.g see "\frac".) In case display math mode, we get very weird output of "\int_a^b". It is difficult to explain how weird it is but something like an output of "b_{\int}^a". Please check an attatched sample. We get the similar kind of weird output of "\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}". Due to these, it is impossible to use XML/HTML output of ConTeXt in real use. 2. \math{\Vmatrix{\vI, \vj, \vk; a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}; b_{1}, b_{2}, b_{3}}} \vI, \vj, \vk are disappeared in xml/html output. What happend? BTW, if we put "a" (or any alphabet?) in fron of \vI, then we get every elements (but of course we get unnecessary "a" also). ------------- bSample \setupbackend[export=yes] \definemathmatrix[vmatrix][matrix:bars] [simplecommand=Vmatrix] \define[1]\vsym{\text{\math{\bi #1}}} \define\vI{\vsym{i}} % \define\vi{\vsym{i}} \define\vj{\vsym{j}} \define\vk{\vsym{k}} \starttext A simple math. \m{y=\sin x}, \m{\displaystyle y=\frac{\log x}{x}}, \m{\mathbf{A+B=C}}, \m{\mathbb{R}}, \m{\mathfrak{A}}, \m{\mathcal{S}}, A bit complex math. \m{\displaystyle\int_{a}^{b}x\sin x\,dx=-[x\cos x]_{a}^{b}+\int_{a}^{b}\cos x\,dx} \startformula \int_{a}^{b}x\sin x\,dx=-[x\cos x]_{a}^{b}+\int_{a}^{b}\cos x\,dx \stopformula \m{\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{n!}} \startformula \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{n!} \stopformula \math{\Vmatrix{\vI, \vj, \vk; a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}; b_{1}, b_{2}, b_{3}}} \math{\Vmatrix{a\vI, \vj, \vk; a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}; b_{1}, b_{2}, b_{3}}} \stoptext ------------- eSample Thanks in advance. Best regards, Atsuhito Kohda
Hi,
On 8 Aug 2019, at 01:06, Atsuhito Kohda
wrote: Hi all, I used to compile a beamer file with LuaLaTeX to generate a PDF for presentation then convert the beamer file to XHTML with LaTeXML for Web page. Recently I begin to use ConTeXt so I try to get a PDF for presentation and also XML/HTML output from a single ConTeXt file. I have a few questions about XML/HTML output of Math.
1. In case inline math mode with \displaystyle, we get wrong output of "\int_a^b"; lower limit and upper limit are interchanged and further "b" is a bit larger and an integral symbol is rather small. (It looks "\displaystyle" is not effective, e.g see "\frac”.)
I opened the xhtml with firefox and the only problem I see is the ignored \displaystyle (which is why the integral looks small). Inline looks fine otherwise, no interchanging of limits. Well, as fine as it can be in firefox, which is pretty bad.
In case display math mode, we get very weird output of "\int_a^b”.
ConTeXt outputs b_a^\int in display mode; the order of the objects inside the generated <msubsub> is wrong, which is clearly a bug. And it seems to do this for all large operators.
2. \math{\Vmatrix{\vI, \vj, \vk; a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}; b_{1}, b_{2}, b_{3}}} \vI, \vj, \vk are disappeared in xml/html output. What happend?
I think this somehow triggered by the nested mode switch (\text{\math{}}) in the \vsym. If I change that definition to the more simple: \define[1]\vsym{{\textstyle\bi #1}} it works ok. Whether that helps you ... Best wishes, Taco
Dear Taco, thanks for your reply.
I opened the xhtml with firefox and the only problem I see is the ignored \displaystyle (which is why the integral looks small). Inline looks fine otherwise, no interchanging of limits.
Hmm, I use firefox 68.0.1 of Ubuntu 19.04 and firefox 60.8.0 of Debian/unstable. I see the interchanging of limits with both firefoxes. BTW, it seems Chromium doesn't support MathML. If any Linux users could test the xhtml with firefox (or any browsers) I believe it would help us much.
Well, as fine as it can be in firefox, which is pretty bad.
I'm not sure if I understand you correctly but I think MathJax might be much better than MathML.
ConTeXt outputs b_a^\int in display mode; the order of the objects inside the generated <msubsub> is wrong, which is clearly a bug. And it seems to do this for all large operators.
I see.
I think this somehow triggered by the nested mode switch (\text{\math{}}) in the \vsym. If I change that definition to the more simple:
\define[1]\vsym{{\textstyle\bi #1}}
it works ok. Whether that helps you ...
It helps me to some extent but with the original definition, we can use \vI in both math mode (\math{\vI}) and text mode like "vector \vI". So if ConTeXt could convert the nested mode switch correctly it would be very nice. Thanks for your info. Best regards, Atsuhito Kohda
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
Hi,
On 9 Aug 2019, at 07:35, Atsuhito Kohda
wrote: Dear Taco, thanks for your reply.
I opened the xhtml with firefox and the only problem I see is the ignored \displaystyle (which is why the integral looks small). Inline looks fine otherwise, no interchanging of limits.
Hmm, I use firefox 68.0.1 of Ubuntu 19.04 and firefox 60.8.0 of Debian/unstable. I see the interchanging of limits with both firefoxes. BTW, it seems Chromium doesn't support MathML. If any Linux users could test the xhtml with firefox (or any browsers) I believe it would help us much.
My firefox is 68.0.1 on MacOS. Small (ugly) screenshot attached.
Hi all, I will attach a screenshot of firefox on Ubuntu 10.04 but I'm not familiar with Gmail so I'm uncertain if it goes well or not. Thanks for your help. Best regards, Atsuhito Kohda ___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
On 8/8/2019 9:41 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
In case display math mode, we get very weird output of "\int_a^b”.
ConTeXt outputs b_a^\int in display mode; the order of the objects inside the generated <msubsub> is wrong, which is clearly a bug. And it seems to do this for all large operators. i'll look into it
Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (3)
-
Atsuhito Kohda
-
Hans Hagen
-
Taco Hoekwater