Hello, for printing python scripts, i wish that the code to be \tt and the reserved word \bold. They are but so lightly that the difference is quasi not visible. The normal text is [sansserif, 10 pt]. Is there a solution? Thanks, rb -- René Bastian www.pythoneon.org www.musiques-rb.org http://www.soundsurvey.org.uk/
On Sat, 01 May 2010 09:53:58 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster
Yes. The contrats of the tex fonts cmtt10 & cmttb10 is good (for me :). Bat, due to the Minimal installation, context can not found this fonts which exists in the texlive tree (from 2007) - i use them with plain tex.
-- René Bastian www.pythoneon.org www.musiques-rb.org http://www.soundsurvey.org.uk/
Am 01.05.10 11:25, schrieb R. Bastian:
That's the best i can do with the minimals and Latin Modern. To be honest, use another font when you want to set your whole document in a sans serif style. \starttypescript [mono] [latinmodern-light] \definefontsynonym [Mono] [LMTypewriter-Light] \definefontsynonym [MonoBold] [LMTypewriter-Dark] \definefontsynonym [MonoItalic] [LMTypewriter-LightOblique] \definefontsynonym [MonoSlanted] [LMTypewriter-DarkOblique] \definefontsynonym [MonoBoldItalic] [LMTypewriter-DarkOblique] \definefontsynonym [MonoBoldSlanted] [LMTypewriter-Light] \definefontsynonym [MonoCaps] [LMTypewriter-Light] \definefontsynonym [MonoCapsSlanted] [LMTypewriter-Light] \stoptypescript \definetypeface [mainface] [rm] [serif] [modern] [default] \definetypeface [mainface] [ss] [sans] [modern] [default] %\definetypeface [mainface] [tt] [mono] [modern-light] [default] % no bold style, why? \definetypeface [mainface] [tt] [mono] [latinmodern-light] [default] \definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math] [modern] [default] \setupbodyfont[mainface] \starttext \rm\tf regular \bf bold\par \ss\tf regular \bf bold\par \tt\tf regular \bf bold\par \stoptext Wolfgang
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 16:46, R. Bastian wrote:
The best thing would be to bribe the Polish to add that font. (Though at the moment they are trying to catch the tight deadlines for releasing OpenType Math in LM, so it's not sure that they would have time to work on it before they release math fonts.) On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:45, R. Bastian wrote:
They are Type3 (or is it from cm-super set)? We somehow deliberately decided to drop support for Type3 fonts in minimals.
Complete installation of ConTeXt won't help you (maybe ConTeXt scheme from TeX Live could help). There is no appropriate LM font available and we didn't add CM fonts to installation. Mojca
participants (3)
-
Mojca Miklavec -
R. Bastian -
Wolfgang Schuster