On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 21:53, Robert Blackstone wrote:

Hi All, I am working on a text that contains many combined figures, some side by side,  some arranged vertically. I use, following “ConTeXt, an excursion”, \startcombination[1*2] and \startcombination[2*1] respectively. The first one works, the second doesn’t, that is, it also places the figures one above the other. It happens both with the “MacTeX”-version of ConTeXt and with the minimals. What can I do to place two figures side by side with a single caption?

Both variants work for me. \starttext \placefigure{some title} {\startcombination[1*2] {\framed[width=5cm]{}}{} {\framed[width=5cm]{}}{} \stopcombination} \placefigure{some title} {\startcombination[2*1] {\framed[width=5cm]{}}{} {\framed[width=5cm]{}}{} \stopcombination} \stoptext Mojca

For me normally \startcombination[2*1] .. works. MKII; Side by side with a single caption. Please tell me if I didnt understand your problem. Greetings Tom On May 8, 2009, at 21:53 , Robert Blackstone wrote:

Hi All, I am working on a text that contains many combined figures, some side by side, some arranged vertically. I use, following “ConTeXt, an excursion”, \startcombination[1*2] and \startcombination[2*1] respectively. The first one works, the second doesn’t, that is, it also places the figures one above the other. It happens both with the “MacTeX”-version of ConTeXt and with the minimals. What can I do to place two figures side by side with a single caption? Thanks in advance, Robert Blackstone ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________