- ntg-pdftex - NTG Mailing Lists

[pdftex-Bugs][4341] Stream dictionary improperly formatted
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 14 Jul '11

14 Jul '11

Bugs item #4341, was opened at 2011-07-14 00:38 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Vincent Immler (vini) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Stream dictionary improperly formatted Category: Primitives Group: v1.40.8 Resolution: Works For Me Initial Comment: Testing with: Acrobat 9.4.5 (Mac/US-EN) and pdftex-1.40.11 (TeXLive2010): Running Acrobat's preflight using "Verify compliance with PDF/A-1b" results in several errors. It appears to me, that Adobe has changed something, as it worked worked some time ago (at least for me with an older version of both Acrobat and pdftex). Preflight complains about the following: [X] Syntax problem: Indirect object "endobj" keyword not preceded by an EOL marker [X] Syntax problem: Indirect object "obj" keyword not followed by an EOL marker [X] Syntax problem: Stream dictionary improperly formatted The appended patch applies to pdftex.web and solves the first two problems. The third one is not solved yet and only occurs when including XMP data (could be a problem with xmpincl.sty or the provided xmp data file). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Vincent Immler (vini) Date: 2011-07-14 12:14 Message: I made progress in solving the last problem and found out, that it does not seem to be related to pdftex. To my best knowledge, it is because of xmpincl.sty when generating the xmpi file for inclusion. The way how the .xmp is read needs to be improved and I'm currently working on that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Vincent Immler (vini) Date: 2011-07-14 00:56 Message: Just attached a PDF that has the error, so you can check. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4341&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4341] Stream dictionary improperly formatted
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 14 Jul '11

14 Jul '11

Bugs item #4341, was opened at 2011-07-14 00:38 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Vincent Immler (vini) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Stream dictionary improperly formatted Category: Primitives Group: v1.40.8 Resolution: Works For Me Initial Comment: Testing with: Acrobat 9.4.5 (Mac/US-EN) and pdftex-1.40.11 (TeXLive2010): Running Acrobat's preflight using "Verify compliance with PDF/A-1b" results in several errors. It appears to me, that Adobe has changed something, as it worked worked some time ago (at least for me with an older version of both Acrobat and pdftex). Preflight complains about the following: [X] Syntax problem: Indirect object "endobj" keyword not preceded by an EOL marker [X] Syntax problem: Indirect object "obj" keyword not followed by an EOL marker [X] Syntax problem: Stream dictionary improperly formatted The appended patch applies to pdftex.web and solves the first two problems. The third one is not solved yet and only occurs when including XMP data (could be a problem with xmpincl.sty or the provided xmp data file). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Vincent Immler (vini) Date: 2011-07-14 00:56 Message: Just attached a PDF that has the error, so you can check. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4341&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4341] Stream dictionary improperly formatted
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 14 Jul '11

14 Jul '11

Bugs item #4341, was opened at 2011-07-14 00:38 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Vincent Immler (vini) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Stream dictionary improperly formatted Category: Primitives Group: v1.40.8 Resolution: Works For Me Initial Comment: Testing with: Acrobat 9.4.5 (Mac/US-EN) and pdftex-1.40.11 (TeXLive2010): Running Acrobat's preflight using "Verify compliance with PDF/A-1b" results in several errors. It appears to me, that Adobe has changed something, as it worked worked some time ago (at least for me with an older version of both Acrobat and pdftex). Preflight complains about the following: [X] Syntax problem: Indirect object "endobj" keyword not preceded by an EOL marker [X] Syntax problem: Indirect object "obj" keyword not followed by an EOL marker [X] Syntax problem: Stream dictionary improperly formatted The appended patch applies to pdftex.web and solves the first two problems. The third one is not solved yet and only occurs when including XMP data (could be a problem with xmpincl.sty or the provided xmp data file). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4341&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex] New document - abcde
by noreply＠sarovar.org 13 Jul '11

13 Jul '11

Project: pdftex Group: Document title: abcde Document description: my second try Submitter: Nobody (None) ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sarovar.org/docman/index.php?group_id=106

1 0

Fwd: [poppler] 2 commits - poppler/GfxFont.cc poppler/GlobalParams.cc poppler/TextOutputDev.cc poppler/TextOutputDev.h poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.cc poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.h poppler/XpdfPluginAPI.cc
by Martin Schröder 10 Jul '11

10 Jul '11

:-{ Best Martin ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Albert Astals Cid <aacid(a)kde.org> Date: 2011/7/10 Subject: Re: [poppler] 2 commits - poppler/GfxFont.cc poppler/GlobalParams.cc poppler/TextOutputDev.cc poppler/TextOutputDev.h poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.cc poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.h poppler/XpdfPluginAPI.cc To: poppler(a)lists.freedesktop.org A Sunday, July 10, 2011, Martin Schröder va escriure: > 2011/7/10 Albert Astals Cid <aacid(a)kemper.freedesktop.org>: > > And 3 years later, Ed has answered :-) > > > > Now all our changes are GPLv2+ > > For clarification: Does that mean that poppler has gone/will go from > GPLv2 & GPLv2+ to GPLv2+? Because then LuaTeX and other "users" of > poppler could also go to GPLv2+. Poppler is xpdf + poppler changes. All poppler changes are now GPL2+ but xpdf is still GPLv2 AFAIK. So the answer to your question would be no. Albert

1 0

Fwd: [poppler] 2 commits - poppler/GfxFont.cc poppler/GlobalParams.cc poppler/TextOutputDev.cc poppler/TextOutputDev.h poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.cc poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.h poppler/XpdfPluginAPI.cc
by Martin Schröder 10 Jul '11

10 Jul '11

It seems XPDF is now under GPLv2+. :-) Best Martin ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Albert Astals Cid <aacid(a)kemper.freedesktop.org> Date: 2011/7/10 Subject: [poppler] 2 commits - poppler/GfxFont.cc poppler/GlobalParams.cc poppler/TextOutputDev.cc poppler/TextOutputDev.h poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.cc poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.h poppler/XpdfPluginAPI.cc To: poppler(a)lists.freedesktop.org poppler/GfxFont.cc | 3 +++ poppler/GlobalParams.cc | 3 +++ poppler/TextOutputDev.cc | 3 +++ poppler/TextOutputDev.h | 3 +++ poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.cc | 3 +++ poppler/UnicodeTypeTable.h | 3 +++ poppler/XpdfPluginAPI.cc | 3 +++ 7 files changed, 21 insertions(+) New commits: commit 214322f3c66a9aad4e2a46f6e305a3dacaa4f8b1 Author: Albert Astals Cid <aacid(a)kde.org> Date: Sun Jul 10 01:20:21 2011 +0100 And 3 years later, Ed has answered :-) Now all our changes are GPLv2+ diff --git a/poppler/GfxFont.cc b/poppler/GfxFont.cc index d80208d..114c797 100644 --- a/poppler/GfxFont.cc +++ b/poppler/GfxFont.cc @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ // // Modified under the Poppler project - http://poppler.freedesktop.org // +// All changes made under the Poppler project to this file are licensed +// under GPL version 2 or later +//

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4316] glyphtounicode.tex contains wrong entries
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Bugs item #4316, was opened at 2010-08-02 02:23 Status: Closed Priority: 3 Submitted By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Assigned to: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Summary: glyphtounicode.tex contains wrong entries Category: Fonts Group: None Resolution: Accepted Initial Comment: Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 00:39:36 +0100 (BST) From: "Dr. Clea F. Rees" <cfrees(a)imapmail.org> ... should glyphtounicode.tex be using: {precedesequal}{2AAF} {followsequal}{2AB0} rather than mapping these to 227C and 227D? glyphtounicode.tex seems to disagree with both STIX and fontforge, as well as Hirwen. I think 227C and 227D correspond to characters in AMS MS A: {precedesorcurly}{227C} {followsorcurly}{227D} rather than the characters in OMS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lev Bishop (levbishop) Date: 2011-06-05 18:45 Message: Where can I get a copy of the improved glyphtounicode.tex? The version in SVN dates to 2007. Google for "eddie kohler glyphtounicode.tex" only returns this bug tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: The Thanh Han (hanthethanh) Date: 2010-12-18 21:16 Message: glyphtounicode.tex has been much improved and is being maintained by Eddie Kohler now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4316&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4338] \pdfmdfivesum with keyword file
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 04 May '11

04 May '11

Bugs item #4338, was opened at 2011-05-04 08:34 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Heiko Oberdiek (oberdiek) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: \pdfmdfivesum with keyword file Category: Documentation Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: The manual of pdfTeX (2010-11-23, rev. 655) is incomplete for \pdfmdfivesum. It also knows the keyword "file", then <general text> is interpreted as file name and the MD5 checksum is calculated for the data in the file, Example: \pdfmdfivesum file {test.tex} calculates the MD5 checksum for test.tex. Yours sincerely Heiko Oberdiek ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4338&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Support Requests][4337] Text inside lstlisting in generated PDF have extra spaces
by pdftex-supportrequests＠sarovar.org 04 Apr '11

04 Apr '11

Support Requests item #4337, was opened at 2011-04-04 15:06 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: MaxiM Basunov (mbasunov) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Text inside lstlisting in generated PDF have extra spaces Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: Hello. In our documents we use lstlisting and PDF, generated with pdflatex, contains extra spaces between characters, so it makes PDF unuseful for copy-paste. Attached files produce following text when copied from PDF: a sdf l i s t i n g /home/ t e s t / t e s t 2 l i n e 2 \\ t e s t \bbb\ t e s t 2 Sample from other document: "1. exported resources configured" when copied to clipboard produce some missed characters: "1. exported resources congured." Please help to solve these issues. Can it be solved with my local settings? PS: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick. Acrobat Reader 9.4 lyx 1.6.7-1 texlive-latex-base 2009-10 pdfTeX 3.1415926-1.40.10-2.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) kpathsea version 5.0.0 Copyright 2009 Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh (pdfTeX). There is NO warranty. Redistribution of this software is covered by the terms of both the pdfTeX copyright and the Lesser GNU General Public License. For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING and the pdfTeX source. Primary author of pdfTeX: Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh (pdfTeX). Compiled with libpng 1.2.44; using libpng 1.2.44 Compiled with zlib 1.2.3.4; using zlib 1.2.3.4 Compiled with poppler version 0.14.2 Thank you, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=494&aid=4337&group_id=106

1 0

[pdftex-Bugs][4336] Distorted audio with beamer
by pdftex-bugs＠sarovar.org 02 Apr '11

02 Apr '11

Bugs item #4336, was opened at 2011-04-02 13:53 Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: Ian Finlayson (ian_fin) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Distorted audio with beamer Category: None Group: None Resolution: None Initial Comment: I've encountered a problem in 1.40.11 that isn't present in 1.40.10. I've been trying to embed audio in Beamer presentations and when I try and play it back in Adobe Reader, in Windows, the audio is distorted. I've tried building the presentation through other methods (latex -> dvips -> ps2pdf) and it works fine, so definitely seems to be an issue with pdflaTeX. Attached an example with the .tex, the original audio and a PDF created through pdflatex and another created by ps2pdf (ps2pdf doesn't embed audio, so you'll need to have it in the same folder as the .pdf) for comparison. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sarovar.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493&aid=4336&group_id=106

1 0