On 2005-05-18 14:37:31 +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
On 2005-05-18 12:53:12 +0200, Hartmut Henkel wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2005, The Thanh Han wrote:
There are still a few pending issues:
1) while we are renaming some promitives to be consistent, would it be better to change the following as well:
How about keeping the old names as well, but undocumenting them (and maybe giving a warning if they are used, i.e. deprecating them)?
pdfoptionpdfminorversion -> pdfminorversion
I've removed the warning for \pdfoptionpdfminorversion and made \pdfoptionpdfminorversion a simple alias of \pdfminorversion, because they could not be used both in a document safely: ---------------- \pdfoptionpdfminorversion=4 \pdfminorversion=5 ---------------- The code from \pdfoptionpdfminorversion always won (I noticed this because the manual stayed at 1.5 although the source had a \pdfminorversion=3). The reason is this code: ---------------- @p procedure check_pdfminorversion; begin if not pdf_minor_version_written then begin if pdf_option_pdf_minor_version <> 0 then begin pdf_warning(0,"Primitive \pdfoptionpdfminorversion is obsolete; use \pdfminorversion instead.",true); pdf_minor_version := pdf_option_pdf_minor_version; end; ---------------- Fixing this properly seems too difficult (and not worth it) to me. :-{ Best Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de