19 Jul
2005
19 Jul
'05
1:13 a.m.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Hans Hagen wrote:
That's what the new "et" option of the appended tiny experimental patch does; it forces an ET if required, but without transform.
maybe use 'text' instead of 'et'
ah, after Martin's hint to Figure 4.1 in the PDf ref. it means that \pdfliteral et {} puts stuff within the "page description level" so maybe another name for it could be \pdfliteral page {}? Regards, Hartmut