Re: [NTG-pdftex] \pdfprimitive

� wrote:

2007/4/6, Philip & Le Khanh :

...

rather than just PDF primitives ... If this is the case, is there any chance of a better choice of name in a future release ?

Would you prefer a pdfTeX version that suddenly has a primitive \foo thus potentially breaking all documents already providing \foo ? :-)

if a document provides \foo, then a nw primitive \foo is never seen because the document obscures it; actually, the user won't even notice; only when a macro package uses \foo there could be a problem but that's seldom the user's concern Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------